4.5 Article

EFFECTIVENESS OF TWO VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAMMES IN WOMEN WITH LONG-TERM SICK LEAVE DUE TO PAIN SYNDROME OR MENTAL ILLNESS: 1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

期刊

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 170-177

出版社

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2188

关键词

return to work; vocational rehabilitation; multidisciplinary rehabilitation; acceptance and commitment therapy, chronic pain

资金

  1. REHSAM
  2. Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs
  3. National Insurance Office
  4. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions
  5. Vardalstiftelsen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Mental illness and chronic pain are common reasons for long-term sick leave, typically more so for women. This study investigated the effects on return to work of 2 vocational rehabilitation programmes. Methods: In this randomized controlled study, 308 women were allocated to treatment with acceptance and commitment therapy, to multidisciplinary assessment and individualized rehabilitation interventions, or to a control group. Return-to-work at 12 months was assessed as: (i) returning to health insurance; (ii) number of reimbursed health insurance days during follow-up; (iii) self-reported change in working hours; (iv) a composite measure of self-reported change in work-related engagement. Results: The mean age of the Swedish study population was 48.5 years (standard deviation (SD) 6.3 years) and the mean time on sick leave 7.5 years (SD 3.2 years). There were no significant differences in reimbursed days or returning to the health insurance at 12 months. The multidisciplinary assessment and individualized rehabilitation interventions group, compared with control, reported a significant increase in working hours per week, as well as a significant increase in work-related engagement. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary assessments and individual rehabilitation interventions may improve the chance of return-to-work in women with long-term sick leave due to pain condition or mental illness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据