4.5 Article

Label-free surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of lipid-rafts from hepatocyte plasma membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 659-667

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jrs.5101

关键词

SERS; PCA; hepatocyte; plasma membrane; lipid rafts; cholesterol

资金

  1. CONACYT [180726]
  2. DGAPA-UNAM [IN-205814-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipid rafts are sphingomyelin/cholesterol-rich domains present in the plasma membrane of eukaryotic cells. In the hepatocyte, it has been shown that these domains intervene and modify a wide range of functions from which cell signaling in health and disease is of major importance. The present investigation proposes a novel strategy for the study of plasma membrane lipid rafts using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) and spectra processing employing the principal component analysis (PCA) in correlation with conventional biochemical techniques. SERS has been used for artificial membranes; our approach has the advantage that allows studying purified biological membranes using small volumes of biological samples and a very simple protocol. Therefore, the use of SERS/PCA represents an important advantage for the study not only of the structure and composition of biological membranes but also for the understanding of the functions carried by the membrane-embedded proteins. Our work using SERS/PCA for the first time shows a correlation when studying the composition of lipid rafts from the cell plasma membrane and the catalytic activity of the Ca2+-ATPase, and its direct association with the presence of specific lipids located in membrane lipid rafts. Also, we show that changes in plasma membrane and the catalytic activity of the Ca2+-ATPase activity present in the plasma membrane of hepatocytes after partial depletion of membrane cholesterol carried out by methyl-beta-cyclodextrin correlate with the changes in the enzyme activity and the presence of cholesterol-rich domains of lipid rafts. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据