4.5 Article

Ames-2016 line lists for 13 isotopologues of CO2: Updates, consistency, and remaining issues

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.04.026

关键词

Carbon dioxide; Infrared intensity; Line list; Isotopologues; Semi-empirical refinement; Spectroscopic database; Potential energy surface; Dipole moment surface; Rovibrational

资金

  1. NASA
  2. NASA/SETI [NNX15AF45A, NNX12AJ19A]
  3. NASA [13-PATM13-0012]
  4. NASA [803838, NNX15AF45A, 43363, NNX12AJ19A] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new 626-based Ames-2 PES refinement and Ames-2016 line lists for 13 CO2 isotopologues are reported. A consistent sigma(Rms)=+/- 0.02 cm(-1) is established for hundreds of isotopologue band origins using the Ames-2 PES. Ames-2016 line lists are computed at 296K, 1000K and 4000K using the Ames-2 PES and the same DMS-N2 dipole surface used previously, with) up to 150, E' up to 24,000 cm-1 or 18,000 cm(-1) and appropriate intensity cutoffs. The lists are compared to the CDSD-296, CDSD-4000 databases, UCL line lists, and a few recent highly accurate CO2 intensity measurements. Both agreements and discrepancies are discussed. Compared to the old Ames CO2 lists, the Ames-2016 line lists have line position deviations reduced by 50% or more, which consequently leads to more reliable intensities. The line shape parameters in the Ames-2016 line lists are predicted using the newly assigned conventional vibrational polyad quantum numbers for rovibrational levels below 12,000 cm(-1) so the quality of the line shape parameters is similar to that of CDSD or HITRAN. This study further proves that a semi-empirically refined PES (Ames-1 and Ames-2) coupled with a high quality ab initio DMS (DMS-N2 and UCL) may generate IR predictions with consistent accuracy and is thus helpful in the analysis of laboratory spectra and simulations of various isotopologues. The Ames-2016 lists based on DMS-N2 have reached the similar to 1% intensity prediction accuracy level for the recent 626 30013-00001 and 20013-00001 bands, but further quantification and improvements require sub-percent or sub-half-percent accurate experimental intensities. The inter-isotopologue consistency of the intensity prediction accuracies should have reached better than 1-3% for regular bands not affected by resonances. Since the Effective Dipole Models (EDM) in CDSD and HITRAN have 1-20% or even larger uncertainties, we show that the Ames lists can provide better alternative IR data for many hard-to-determine isotopologue bands. Comparison at 4000K suggests that the Ames-4000K (CO2)-C-12-O-16 line list is reliable and consistent within the current cutoffs of J <= 150 and E' <= 24,000 cm(-1), but intensity contributions involving higher energy levels should not be omitted and future computations need to be converged up to at least 32,000 cm(-1) or higher. The remaining issues are discussed regarding the source of energy level discrepancies, intensity underestimations by similar to 50% for some weak bands, etc. and also future work. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据