4.5 Article

Number of recent stressful life events and incident cardiovascular disease: Moderation by lifetime depressive disorder

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 149-154

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.06.008

关键词

Life change events; Stress,psychological; Depressive disorder; Cardiovascular diseases; Prospective studies; Epidemiologic studies

资金

  1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL122245]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We investigated whether number of recent stressful life events is associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and whether this relationship is stronger in adults with a history of clinical depression. Methods: Prospective data from 28,583 U.S. adults (mean age = 45 years) initially free of CVD who participated in Waves 1 (2001-2002) and 2 (2004-2005) of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) were examined. Number of past-year stressful life events (Wave 1), lifetime depressive disorder (Wave 1), and incident CVD (Wave 2) were determined by structured interviews. Results: There were 1069 cases of incident CVD. Each additional stressful life event was associated with a 15% increased odds of incident CVD [Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95% Confidence Interval (Cl): 1.11, 1.19]. As hypothesized, a stressful life events by lifetime depressive disorder interaction was detected (P = 0.003). Stratified analyses indicated that stressful life events had a stronger association with incident CVD among adults with (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27, n = 4908) versus without (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.14, n = 23,675) a lifetime depressive disorder. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a greater number of recent stressful life events elevate the risk of new-onset CVD and that this risk is potentiated in adults with a history of clinical depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据