4.3 Article

Visible light-excitable ZnO/2D graphitic-C3N4 heterostructure for the photodegradation of naphthalene

期刊

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 286-296

出版社

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2019.24422

关键词

Zinc oxide; g-C3N4; Photocatalysts; Water pollution; PAHs; Naphthalene

资金

  1. Water Research Commission (WRC)
  2. North-West University in South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, ZnO/g-C3N4 heterostructure was synthesized with enhanced photodegradation potential for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (viz. naphthalene) in water using visible light. The as-prepared catalysts were characterized via different techniques such as scanning electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, fourier transform infrared, ultraviolet visible (UV-Vis), photoluminescence, and X-ray diffractometry to elucidate their physicochemical and structural properties. The identified properties of the newly synthesized heterostructure catalyst indicated a successful integration of physicochemical characteristics suitable for effective photocatalytic degradation activities. The kinetics study and mechanism of photodegradation of naphthalene using ZnO/g-C3N4 heterostructure have been discussed in detail. The photodegradation outcomes demonstrated that the synthesized heterostructure of semiconductors was more effective than the parent catalyst ZnO nanoparticles because of better light absorption for higher photogeneration of electrons and holes, suppressed recombination rate, and consequently prolonged availability of active species for degradation. The ZnO/g-C3N4 heterostructure has exhibited a photocatalytic efficiency of 84.5% in 4 h, which was relatively higher than the photocatalytic efficiency of individual photocatalysts. Thus, this report highlights the potential of as-prepared heterostructure for the photodegradation of naphthalene under visible light, therefore suggesting an avenue for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with PAHs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据