4.3 Review

Autism spectrum disorder: Consensus guidelines on assessment, treatment and research from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 3-29

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269881117741766

关键词

Autism; treatment; guidelines; neurodevelopmental; aetiology

资金

  1. MRC [MR/N026063/1, G0700995] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [1116129, 1389982] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0514-10073, RP-PG-0606-1045] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G0700995, MR/N026063/1, MC_U120097115] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Department of Health [RP-PG-0606-1045] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An expert review of the aetiology, assessment, and treatment of autism spectrum disorder, and recommendations for diagnosis, management and service provision was coordinated by the British Association for Psychopharmacology, and evidence graded. The aetiology of autism spectrum disorder involves genetic and environmental contributions, and implicates a number of brain systems, in particular the gamma-aminobutyric acid, serotonergic and glutamatergic systems. The presentation of autism spectrum disorder varies widely and co-occurring health problems (in particular epilepsy, sleep disorders, anxiety, depression, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and irritability) are common. We did not recommend the routine use of any pharmacological treatment for the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder. In children, melatonin may be useful to treat sleep problems, dopamine blockers for irritability, and methylphenidate, atomoxetine and guanfacine for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The evidence for use of medication in adults is limited and recommendations are largely based on extrapolations from studies in children and patients without autism spectrum disorder. We discuss the conditions for considering and evaluating a trial of medication treatment, when non-pharmacological interventions should be considered, and make recommendations on service delivery. Finally, we identify key gaps and limitations in the current evidence base and make recommendations for future research and the design of clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据