4.7 Article

Thermal Shock Induces Host Proteostasis Disruption and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in the Model Symbiotic Cnidarian Aiptasia

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 2121-2134

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00797

关键词

Aiptasia; cnidaria; coral reefs; endoplasmic reticulum; label-free proteomics; symbiosis; thermal stress; unfolded protein response

资金

  1. Marsden Fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand [1202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coral bleaching has devastating effects on coral survival; arid reef ecosystem ftindiort,i but many of the fundamental cellular effects of thermal stress on cnidarian physiology are unclear. We used label-free liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to compare the effects of rapidly (33.S degrees C,';24 h) and gradually'. (30 and 33.5 degrees C, 12 Clays) elevated temperatures on. the proteome of the model symbiotic anemone Aiptasia; We identified 2133 proteins in Aiptasia, 136 of which were differentially abundant between treatments.; Thermal shock, but not acclimation, resulted in significant abundance changes in 104 proteins, including those involved in protein folding and synthesis, redox homeostasis, and:central metabolism. Nineteen abundant structural proteins. showed particularly reduced abundance, demonstrating proteostasis, disruption and phtential proteih synthesis inhibition. Heat shock induced antioxidant mechanisms and proteins involved in stabilizing nascent proteins, preventing. protein aggregation arid degrading damaged proteins, which is indicative of endoplasmic reticulum stress: Host proteostasis disruption occurred before either bleaching or symbiont photoinhibition was detected, suggesting host-derived reactive oxygen species production as the proximate cause of thermal damage. The pronounced abundance changes in endoplasmic reticulum proteins associated with proteostasis and protein turnover indicate that these processes ate essential in the cellular response of symbiotic cnidarians to severe thermal stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据