4.7 Article

Long-Term Stability of Human Plasma Metabolites during Storage at-80 °C

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 203-211

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00518

关键词

biobanking; metabolomics; long-term stability; human plasma; storage; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking [115317]
  2. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme
  3. Helmholtz Society
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education, and Research (BMBF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prolonged storage of biospecimen can lead to artificially altered metabolite concentrations and thus bias data analysis in metabolomics experiments. To elucidate the potential impact of long-term storage on the metabolite profile, a pooled human plasma sample was aliquoted and stored at 80 degrees C. During a time period of five years, 1012 of the aliquots were measured with the Biocrates AbsoluteIDQ p180 targeted-metabolomics assay at 193 time points. Modeling the concentration courses over time revealed that 55 out of 111 metabolites remained stable. The statistically significantly changed metabolites showed on average an increase or decrease of +13.7% or -14.5%, respectively. In detail, increased concentration levels were observed for amino acids (mean: +15.4%), the sum of hexoses (+7.9%), butyrylcarnitine (+9.4%), and some phospholipids mostly with chain lengths exceeding 40 carbon atoms (mean: +18.0%). Lipids tended to exhibit decreased concentration levels with the following mean concentration changes: acylcarnitines, -12.1%; lysophosphatidylcholines, -15.1%; diacyl-phosphatidylcholines, -17.0%; acyl-alkyl-phosphatidylcholines, -13.3%; sphingomye-lins, -14.8%. We conclude that storage of plasma samples at -80 degrees C for up to five years can lead to altered concentration levels of amino acids, acylcarnitines, glycerophospholipids, sphingomyelins, and the sum of hexoses. These alterations must be considered when analyzing metabolomics data from long-term epidemiological studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据