4.7 Article

Discrimination of Four Marine Biofilm-Forming Bacteria by LC-MS Metabolomics and Influence of Culture Parameters

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 1962-1975

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b01027

关键词

marine bacteria; biofilms; metabolomics; liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; MS/MS networking; ornithine lipids; polyamines

资金

  1. French Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur (PACA) regional council
  2. French Mediterranean Marine Competitivity Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most marine bacteria can form biofilms, and they are the main components of biofilms observed on marine surfaces. Biofihns constitute a widespread life strategy, as growing in such structures offers many important biological benefits. The molecular compounds expressed in biofilms and, more generally, the metabolomes of marine bacteria remain poorly studied. In this context, a nontargeted LC-MS metabolomics approach of marine biofilm-forming bacterial strains was developed. Four marine bacteria, Persicivirga (Nonlabens) mediterranea TC4 and TC7, Pseudoalteromonas lipolytica TC8, and Shewanella sp. TC11, were used as model organisms. The main objective was to search for some strain specific bacterial metabolites and to determine how culture parameters (culture medium, growth phase, and mode of culture) may affect the cellular metabolism of each strain and thus the global interstrain metabolic discrimination. LC-MS profiling and statistical partial least-squares discriminant analyses showed that the four strains could be differentiated at the species level whatever the medium, the growth phase, or the mode of culture (planktonic vs biofilm). A MS/MS molecular network was subsequently built and allowed the identification of putative bacterial biomarkers. TC8 was discriminated by a series of ornithine lipids, while the P. mediterranea strains produced hydroxylated ornithine and glycine lipids. Among the P. mediterranea TC7 extracts were distinguished by the occurrence of diamine derivatives, such as putrescine amides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据