4.7 Article

Improved measurement of the reactor antineutrino flux at Daya Bay

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 100, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.052004

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China
  2. U.S. Department of Energy
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. CAS Center for Excellence in Particle Physics
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  6. Guangdong provincial government
  7. Shenzhen municipal government
  8. China General Nuclear Power Group
  9. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China
  10. Ministry of Education in Taiwan
  11. U.S. National Science Foundation
  12. Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic
  13. Charles University Research Centre UNCE
  14. Joint Institute of Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia
  15. NSFC-RFBR joint research program
  16. National Commission of Scientific and Technological Research of Chile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work reports a precise measurement of the reactor antineutrino flux using 2.2 million inverse beta decay (IBD) events collected with the Daya Bay near detectors in 1230 days. The dominant uncertainty on the neutron detection efficiency is reduced by 56% with respect to the previous measurement through a comprehensive neutron calibration and detailed data and simulation analysis. The new average IBD yield is determined to be (5.91 +/- 0.09) x 10(-43) cm(2)/fission with total uncertainty improved by 29%. The corresponding mean fission fractions from the four main fission isotopes U-235, U-238, Pu-239, and( 241)Pu are 0.564, 0.076, 0.304, and 0.056, respectively. The ratio of measured to predicted antineutrino yield is found to be 0.952 +/- 0.014 +/- 0.023 (1.001 +/- 0.015 +/- 0.027) for the Huber-Mueller (ILL-Vogel) model, where the first and second uncertainty are experimental and theoretical model uncertainty, respectively. This measurement confirms the discrepancy between the world average of reactor antineutrino flux and the Huber-Mueller model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据