4.3 Article

Clinical fellowship for an innovative, integrated BSN-PhD program: An academic and practice partnership

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 282-286

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.12.001

关键词

Nursing education; Innovation; PhD; Clinical training; Early entry PhD program

类别

资金

  1. National Research Service Award (NRSA) Doctoral Fellowship [T32NR007100]
  2. Hillman Scholars Program for Nursing Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Opportunities for research-focused doctoral education must be available to nurses early in their careers in order to ensure the further development of nursing science. Early entry into the research doctorate through an integrated BSN-PhD program is one innovative approach. This approach highlights the value of integrating post-licensure clinical training into the doctoral curriculum. To better prepare innovative nurse scientists early in their careers we developed a clinical nurse fellowship within an integrated BSN-PhD program in partnership with an affiliated health system. The aims of this clinical fellowship are to integrate post-licensure clinical experience with academic preparation, cultivate scholarly reflection on the connections between research and practice, educate nurse researchers to work effectively in interdisciplinary teams, and develop nurses' contributions to health care innovation. Major considerations for the development of similar clinical training opportunities include clarifying and articulating the major aims of the fellowship, enlisting the support of executive clinical leadership, and placing fellows on nursing units with experienced and advanced nursing teams and management that supports the fellowship's aims. We emphasize the fully integrated and collaborative activities, decision-making, and commitment required of both academic and health system partners to successfully implement similar clinical training opportunities. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据