4.4 Article

Phosphorus mirabilis: Illuminating the Past and Future of Phosphorus Stewardship

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 1127-1132

出版社

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2019.07.0266

关键词

-

资金

  1. J.R. Simplot Company
  2. The Mosaic Co.
  3. The Fertilizer Institute
  4. Fertilizer Canada
  5. OCP
  6. Nutrien
  7. Tyson Foods, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After its discovery in 1669, phosphorus (P) was named Phosphorus mirabilis (the miraculous bearer of light), arising from the chemoluminescence when white P is exposed to the atmosphere. The metaphoric association between P and light resonates through history: from the discovery of P at the start of the Enlightenment period to the vital role of P in photosynthetic capture of light in crop and food production through to new technologies, which seek to capitalize on the interactions between novel ultrathin P allotropes and light, including photocatalysis, solar energy production, and storage. In this introduction to the Journal of Environmental Quality special section Celebrating the 350th Anniversary of Discovering Phosphorus-For Better or Worse, which brings together 22 paper contributions, we shine a spotlight on the historical and emerging challenges and opportunities in research and understanding of the agricultural, environmental, and societal significance of this vital element. We highlight the role of P in water quality impairment and the variable successes of P mitigation measures. We reflect on the need to improve P use efficiency and on the kaleidoscope of challenges facing efficient use of P. We discuss the requirement to focus on place-based solutions for developing effective and lasting P management. Finally, we consider how cross-disciplinary collaborations in P stewardship offer a guiding light for the future, and we explore the glimmers of hope for reconnecting our broken P cycle and the bright new horizons needed to ensure future food, water, and bioresource security for growing global populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据