4.8 Article

Improvement in low-temperature and instantaneous high-rate output performance of Al-free AB5-type hydrogen storage alloy for negative electrode in Ni/MH battery: Effect of thermodynamic and kinetic regulation via partial Mn substituting

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 343, 期 -, 页码 11-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.023

关键词

AB(5)-type hydrogen storage alloy; Low-temperature electrochemical performance; Manganese substitution; Nickel metal hydride battery; Peak power density

资金

  1. Ni/MH Batteries and Materials R & D Coordination Project [15H1110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of Al-free Mn-modified AB(5)-type hydrogen storage alloys have been designed and the effects of thermodynamic stability and electrochemical kinetics on electrochemical performance via Mn substituting have been investigated. Compared with high-Al alloys, the Al-free alloys in this study have better low-temperature performance and instantaneous high-rate output because of the higher surface catalytic ability. After partial substitution of Ni by Mn, both the hydrogen desorption capacity and plateau pressure decrease, and correspondingly results in an improved thermodynamic stability which is adverse to low-temperature delivery. Additionally, with the improvement of charge acceptance ability and anti-corrosion property via Mn substitution, the room -temperature discharge capacity and cycling stability increase slightly. However, Mn adversely affects the electrochemical kinetics and deteriorates both the surface catalytic ability and the bulk hydrogen diffusion ability, leading to the drop of low -temperature dischargeability, high-rate dischargeability and peak power (P-peak). Based on the thermodynamic and kinetic regulation and overall electrochemical properties, the optimal composition is obtained when x = 0.2, the discharge capacity is 243.6 mAh g(-1) at 40 C with 60 mA g(-1), and the P-peak attains to 969.6 W kri at 40 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据