4.8 Article

Study on the reversible capacity loss of layered oxide cathode during low-temperature operation

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 342, 期 -, 页码 24-30

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.033

关键词

Lithium-ion batteries; Low-temperature aging; NCM cathode capacity loss; Lithium plating; Post-mortem analysis

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB932400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51202121, 51232005]
  3. Shenzhen Basic Research Project [ZDSYS20140509172959981, JCYJ20140417115840246]
  4. Guangdong Province Innovation R&D Team Plan for Energy and Environmental Materials [2009010025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, commercial Li(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)O-2/graphite (NCM/C) lithium-ion batteries were cycled at-10 degrees C under different current rates ranging from 0.2 C to 1C. Electrochemical measurements and post-mortem analysis were performed to identify the root causes of the degradation in the electrochemical performance of the cells. The results reveal that apart from the increase of lithium plating on the anode, there is a considerable and abnormal capacity loss on the NCM cathode with the increase in current rate. The different degradation mechanisms including the loss of lithium inventory (LLI) and the specific capacity loss of NCM material (LAM) during cycling at 10 C were analyzed quantitatively. It is shown that the evolution trend of LLI with the increase in current rate (8.6%, 35.0%, 55.8% for 0.2 C, 0.5 C and 1 C respectively) corresponds closely to that of the capacity loss of the full-cells (8.6%, 45.5%, 63.6% for 0.2 C, 0.5 C and 1 C, respectively), which is different to the trend of LAM (7.2%, 8.8%, 22.3% for 0.2 C, 0.5 C and 1 C, respectively). Further analysis by XRD and HR-TEM clearly indicates that the crystallinity of the hexagonal layered structure of NCM was greatly impaired after low-temperature cycling at 10 C, and spinel phase can be observed among the layered structure. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据