4.8 Article

Ultrathin single-crystalline TiO2 nanosheets anchored on graphene to be hybrid network for high-rate and long cycle-life sodium battery electrode application

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 342, 期 -, 页码 405-413

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.077

关键词

Ultrathin single-crystalline TiO2 nanosheets; Graphene; 3D hybrid network; Intimate stacking; Sodium ion battery anode

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [21322105, 51372025, 913233001]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFB0100204]
  3. Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1564206]
  4. Major achievements Transformation Project for Central University in Beijing
  5. Beijing Science and Technology Project [D151100003015001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In view of the growing concern about energy management issues, sodium ion batteries (SIBs) as cheap and environmentally friendly devices have increasingly received wide research attentions. The high current rate and long cycle-life of SIBs are considered as two key parameters determining its potential for practical applications. In this work, the rigid single-crystalline anatase TiO2 nanosheets (NSs) with a thickness of 4 nm has been firstly prepared, based on which a stable nanostructured network consisting of ultrathin anatase TiO2 NSs homogeneously anchored on graphene through chemical bonding (TiO2 NSs-G) has fabricated by hydrothermal process and subsequent calcination treatment. The morphology, crystallization, chemical compositions and the intimate maximum contact between TiO2 NSs and graphene are confirmed by TEM, SEM, XRD, XPS and Raman characterizations. The results of electrochemical performance tests indicated that the TiO2 NSs-G hybrid network could be consider as a promising anode material for SIBs, in assessment of its remarkably high current rate and long cycle-life aside from the improved specific capacity, rate capability and cycle stability. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据