4.8 Article

Bacterial-cellulose-derived interconnected meso-microporous carbon nanofiber networks as binder-free electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 352, 期 -, 页码 34-41

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.088

关键词

Bacterial cellulose; Confined pyrolysis; Self-activation; Carbon nanofibers; Supercapacitors

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB239701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372116, 51504139, 51672128]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150739, BK20151468]
  4. Prospective Joint Research Project of Cooperative Innovation Fund of Jiangsu Province [BY2015003-7]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial cellulose (BC), a typical biomass prepared from the microbial fermentation process, has been proved that it can be an ideal platform for design of three-dimensional (3D) multifunctional nano materials in energy storage and conversion field. Here we developed a simple and general silica-assisted strategy for fabrication of interconnected 3D meso-microporous carbon nanofiber networks by confine nanospace pyrolysis of sustainable BC, which can be used as binder-free electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors. The synthesized carbon nanofibers exhibited the features of interconnected 3D networks architecture, large surface area (624 m(2) g(-1)), mesopores-dominated hierarchical porosity, and high graphitization degree. The as-prepared electrode (CN-BC) displayed a maximum specific capacitance of 302 F g(-1) at a current density of 0.5 A g(-1), high-rate capability and good cyclicity in 6 M KOH electrolyte. This work, together with cost-effective preparation strategy to make high-value utilization of cheap biomass, should have significant implications in the green and mass-producible energy storage. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据