4.8 Article

New hydrogen titanium phosphate sulfate electrodes for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 343, 期 -, 页码 197-206

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.057

关键词

Cathode; Lithium battery; Sodium battery; NASICON; Titanate; Polyanion

资金

  1. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [52830-DNI10]
  2. Center for Bio-Inspired Solar Fuel Production, an Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001016]
  3. Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) project - Department of Defense through the Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF-12-1-0420]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NASICON-type materials with general formula A(x)M(2)(PO4)(3) (A = Li or Na, M = Ti, V, and Fe) are promising candidates for Li-and Na-ion batteries due to their open three-dimensional framework structure. Here we report the electrochemical properties of hydrogen titanium phosphate sulfate, HoATi(2)(PO4)(2.4)(SO4)(0.6) (HTPS), a new mixed polyanion material with NASICON structure. Micron-sized HTPS aggregates with crystallite grain size of ca. 23 nm are synthesized using a sol-gel synthesis in an acidic medium. The properties of the as-synthesized HTPS, ball-milled HTPS, and samples prepared as carbon composites using an in-situ glucose decomposition reaction are investigated. A capacity of 148 mAh r1 corresponding to insertion of 2 Li+ per formula unit is observed in the ball-milled HTPS over the potential window of 1.5-3.4 V vs. Li/Li+. Lithiation at ca. 2.8 and 2.5 V is determined to occur through filling of the M1 and M2 sites, respectively. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) are used characterize the HTPS before and after cycling. Evaluation of the HIPS in a Na-ion cell is also performed. A discharge capacity of 93 mAh g(-1) with sodiation at ca. 2.9 and 2.2 V vs. Na/Na+ is observed.(C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据