4.7 Article

Silica Supported MgO as An Adsorbent for Precombustion CO2 Capture

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 10, 页码 6565-6574

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.9b01481

关键词

nanofibrous silica; KCC-1; precombustion capture; MgO nanocomposites; ordered mesoporous silica; silica supported MgO

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21706224]
  2. Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20170307090749744]
  3. City University of Hong Kong [7200524]
  4. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [CityU 21301817]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MgO-silica nanocomposites were synthesized by dispersing MgO on three different silica supports, viz., ordered mesoporous MCM-41, SBA-15, and the nonporous fibrous silica nanospheres material (KCC-1; KAUST Catalysis Center-1) using a simple wet impregnation-calcination procedure. The materials were evaluated for intermediate-temperature CO2 adsorption (200 degrees C) applicable to precombustion CO2 capture in integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC). The results indicate that both CO2 adsorption capacity and kinetics are substantially improved upon dispersion of MgO on silica supports compared with single component MgO. The morphology of the silica regulates the degree of improvement in CO2 adsorption capacity. Nanoflower silica KCC1 supported MgO, studied for CO2 capture for the first time, shows an approximately 1700% higher CO2 capacity than pristine MgO and 80-110% higher than MgO supported by the other conventional ordered mesoporous silica, that is, MCM-41 or SBA-15. The outstanding adsorption performance of KCC-1 supported MgO is attributed to superior dispersion and 35-1000% higher accessible specific surface area of the bioinspired nanoflower KCC-1 composite compared with MCM-41- and SBA-15-based composites. This research paves the way for developing silica supported adsorbents with readily accessible surface for various gas separation, sensoring, and storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据