4.6 Article

Exploratory assessment of left ventricular strain-volume loops in severe aortic valve diseases

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 595, 期 12, 页码 3961-3971

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/JP273526

关键词

-

资金

  1. Radboud Institute for Health Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to examine left ventricular (LV) strain (epsilon)-volume loops to provide novel insight into the haemodynamic cardiac consequences of aortic valve stenosis (AS) and aortic valve regurgitation (AR). Twenty-seven participants were retrospectively recruited: AR (n = 7), AS (n = 10) and control subjects (n = 10). Standard transthoracic echocardiography was used to obtain apical four-chamber images to construct epsilon-volume relationships, which were assessed using the following parameters: early systolic epsilon (epsilon_ES); slope of epsilon-volume relationship during systole (Sslope); end-systolic peak epsilon (peak epsilon); and diastolic uncoupling (systolic epsilon-diastolic. at same volume) during early diastole (UNCOUP_ED) and late diastole (UNCOUP_LD). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the ability to detect impaired LV function. Although LV ejection fraction was comparable between groups, longitudinal peak. was reduced compared with control subjects. In contrast, epsilon_ES and Sslope were lower in both pathologies compared with control subejcts (P < 0.01), but also different between AS and AR (P < 0.05). UNCOUP_ED and UNCOUP_LD were significantly higher in both patient groups compared with control subjects (P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that loop characteristics (AUC = 0.99, 1.00 and 1.00; all P < 0.01) were better able then peak. (AUC = 0.75, 0.89 and 0.76; P = 0.06, <0.01 and 0.08, respectively) and LV ejection fraction (AUC = 0.56, 0.69 and 0.69; all P > 0.05) to distinguish AS vs control, AR vs control and AS vs AR groups, respectively. Temporal changes in epsilon-volume characteristics provide novel insight into the haemodynamic cardiac impact of AS and AR. Contrary to traditional measures (i.e. ejection fraction, peak epsilon), these novel measures successfully distinguish between the haemodynamic cardiac impact of AS and AR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据