4.8 Article

Developing a sustainable route to environmentally relevant metal-organic frameworks: ultra-rapid synthesis of MFM-300(Al) using microwave heating

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 18, 页码 5039-5045

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9gc02375e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/L022494/1]
  2. University of Nottingham
  3. EPSRC [EP/K005138/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NO2, SO2 and CO2 are major air pollutants causing significant environmental and health problems. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), in particular [Al-2(OH)(2)(C16O8H6)](H2O)(6) (trivial names: NOTT-300/MFM-300(Al)), have shown great promise for capturing these gases. However MOF syntheses often involve toxic solvents and long durations which are inherently energy intensive, an environmental burden, and have serious safety risks. There is a pressing need to develop environmentally-friendly routes to MOFs that require less energy and implement safer solvents particularly when considering scale-up beyond the laboratory for industrial application. We report the rapid synthesis of MFM-300(Al) in aqueous conditions and 10 minutes using microwave heating. This is the fastest reported synthesis of MFM-300(Al) to date with a 99.77% reduction in reaction time compared to the current reported 3-day conventionally heated route. The microwave synthesized sub-micron crystalline material exhibits gas uptake capacities of 8.8 mmol g(-1) at 273 K and 1.0 bar for CO2, 8.5 mmol g(-1) at 298 K and 0.17 bar for SO2, and 1.9 mmol g(-1) at 298 K and 0.01 bar for NO2. These are 26%, 70%, and 90% greater for CO2, SO2, and NO2, respectively, when compared to previously reported MFM-300(Al) materials produced via a 3-day conventionally heated route demonstrating the production of high quality materials in a fraction of the time with enhanced gas properties. Crucially, this offers an opportunity to move from batch to continuous processing owing to reduced reaction times underpinned by targeted heating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据