4.7 Article

How Galactic Environment Affects the Dynamical State of Molecular Clouds and Their Star Formation Efficiency

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 883, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3a43

关键词

ISM: clouds; ISM: kinematics and dynamics; ISM: structure; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: star formation; stars: formation

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [KR4801/1-1]
  2. Sachbeihilfe [KR4801/2-1]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme via the ERC Starting Grant MUSTANG [714907]
  4. DFG [Sonderforschungsbereich SFB 881]
  5. National Science Foundation [1615105, 1615109, 1653300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate how the dynamical state of molecular clouds relates to host galaxy environment and how this impacts the star formation efficiency (SFE,) in the Milky Way and seven nearby galaxies. We compile measurements of molecular cloud and host galaxy properties, and determine mass-weighted mean cloud properties for entire galaxies and distinct subregions within. We find molecular clouds to be in ambient pressure-balanced virial equilibrium, where clouds in gas-rich, molecular-dominated, high-pressure regions are close to self-virialization, whereas clouds in gas-poor, atomic-dominated, low-pressure environments achieve a balance between their internal kinetic pressure and external pressure from the ambient medium. The SFE, per free-fall time of molecular clouds is low, similar to 0.1%-1%, and shows systematic variations of 2 dex as a function of the virial parameter and host galactic environment. The trend observed for clouds in low-pressure environments-as the solar neighborhood-is well matched by state-of-the-art turbulence-regulated models of star formation. However, these models substantially overpredict the low observed SEL,s of clouds in high-pressure environments, which suggest the importance of additional physical parameters not yet considered by these models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据