4.7 Article

Bidirectional Reconnection Outflows in an Active Region

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 883, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3657

关键词

radiation: dynamics; Sun: activity; Sun: UV radiation; techniques: imaging spectroscopy

资金

  1. NNSFC [U1831107, 41774180, 41331068, 11790303 (11790300)]
  2. CSC scholarship
  3. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Shandong [ZR2018MA031]
  4. Key Laboratory of Solar Activity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [KLSA201602]
  5. LESIA at the Observatoire de Paris

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on bidirectional coronal reconnection outflows reaching +/- 200 km s(-1) as observed in an active region with the Si IV and C II spectra of the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS). The evolution of the active region with an emerging flux, a failed filament eruption, and a jet is followed in Solar Dynamical Observatory (SDO)/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) filters from 304 to 94 angstrom, IRIS slit jaw images, and SDO/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager movies. The bidirectional outflow reconnection is located at a bright point visible in multiwavelength AIA filters above an arch filament system. This suggests that the reconnection occurs between rising loops above the emergence of magnetic bipoles and the longer, twisted magnetic field lines remnant of the failed filament eruption one hour before. The reconnection occurs continuously in the corona between quasiparallel magnetic field lines, which is possible in a 3D configuration. The reconnection also triggers a jet with transverse velocities around 60 km s(-1). Blueshifts and redshifts along its axis confirm the existence of a twist along the jet, which could have been transferred from the filament flux rope. The jet finally blows up the material of the filament before coming back during the second phase. In the H alpha Dopplergrams provided by the MSDP spectrograph, we see more redshift than blueshift, indicating the return of the jet and filament plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据