4.5 Review

Impact of iron and manganese nano-metal-oxides on contaminant interaction and fortification potential in agricultural systems - a review

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 377-390

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/EN19063

关键词

agricultural nanotechnology; nutrient uptake

资金

  1. Virginia Tech National Center for Earth and Environmental Nanotechnology Infrastructure (NanoEarth) - NSF [NNCI-1542100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rising population growth and increase global food demand have made meeting the demands of food production and security a major challenge worldwide. Nanotechnology is starting to become a viable remediation strategy of interest in farming. Ultimately, it may be used as a sustainability tool in agricultural systems. In these roles, it could be used to increase the efficiency of techniques such as food monitoring, pathogen control, water treatment and targeted delivery of agrochemicals. In addition to these uses, nanoparticles, particularly nano-metal-oxides (NMOs), have been engineered to act as contaminant scavengers and could be applied to a wide range of systems. Numerous studies have investigated the scavenging ability of NMOs, but few have investigated them in this role in the context of agricultural and food systems. Within these systems, however, research has demonstrated the potential of NMOs to increase crop health and yield but few have studied using NMOs as sources of key micronutrients, such as Fe and Mn. In this review, we address previous research that has used Fe-and Mn-NMOs in agricultural systems, particularly the worldwide crop production of the four major staple foods - rice, wheat, maize and soybeans - highlighting their application as fertilisers and sorbents. Fe- and Mn-NMOs are strong candidates for immobilisation of agricultural contaminants in soils and, because they are naturally ubiquitous, they have the potential to be a cost-effective and sustainable technology compared with other remediation strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据