4.7 Review

Urban amenity, human capital and employment distribution in Shanghai

期刊

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102025

关键词

Urban amenity; Employment distribution; Human capital; Shanghai; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41701183, 41671133]
  2. Ford Foundation [0155-0883]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human capital theory argues that by attracting skilled workers urban amenities are increasingly important to the location decisions of firms and to employment agglomeration. However, this hypothesis has been questioned with respect to the direction of causality at the interurban level, the existence of endogeneity, and confusion between revealed and actual preferences of consumers. In this research, to contribute the existing debate over the relationship between amenities and jobs, we develop a new measurement of private service amenities based on the comments about facilities from Dianping.com, and further relate it to labor markets in Shanghai at the infra-urban level. We find that human capital theory and the distribution of amenities can partially explain the employment agglomeration in Shanghai, and their applicability is also influenced by types of amenities and sectors. Private service amenities, such as entertainment, shopping, for-profit healthcare facilities, and restaurants, are largely associated with the employment agglomeration of producer services at the subdistrict-level, which supports human capital theory, while the agglomeration of manufacturing employment is more likely associated with the development of public facilities such as transportation systems. Our study provides an innovative way to examine urban theories in the context of the social data revolution. It also suggests that the Chinese government has to encourage the decentralization of service amenities to overcome the increasing centrality of producer services and the accelerating marginality of manufacturing employment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据