4.8 Review

Electrocatalytic Water Splitting and CO2 Reduction: Sustainable Solutions via Single-Atom Catalysts Supported on 2D Materials

期刊

SMALL METHODS
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201800492

关键词

2D materials; carbon dioxide utilization; energy applications; single-atom catalysts; water splitting

资金

  1. Future Material Discovery Program from Ministry of Science and ICT through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2016M3D1A1027666]
  2. Basic Science Research Program from Ministry of Science and ICT through the National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B3009135]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-atom catalysts (SACs) have been garnering attention recently due to their excellent performance in significant catalytic reactions such as oxidation, water gas shift, and hydrogenation reactions. Unlike traditional nanocatalysts, the catalytic performance of SACs is highly dependent on the scale of catalysts, low-coordination nature, and interaction between the catalysts and support materials. The size of metal particles is a key factor in determining the performance of the catalysts as the specific activity per metal atom usually increases with decreasing size of metal particles; the small size of metal particles serves as the catalytically active sites. Furthermore, the support materials should have not only an extremely large surface area to host a lot of catalysts in their structures, but also the ability to capture the catalysts appropriately. 2D materials, which have a high specific surface-to-volume ratio and van der Waals forces to capture catalysts, have been considered good support materials. A detailed discussion on the preparation, characterization, and catalytic performance, especially for water splitting and carbon dioxide utilization reactions using SACs supported on 2D materials, is provided; the main advantages of SACs and the associated challenges for improving their catalytic performance are highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据