4.2 Article

Modeling of excitation dynamics in photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes: exact versus perturbative approaches

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6455/aa6b87

关键词

photosynthesis; energy transfer; exciton; coherence; exciton-phonon coupling; light-harvesting antenna

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [15-04-02136]
  2. VU University Amsterdam
  3. Laserlab-Europe Consortium
  4. Foundation of Chemical Sciences part of NWO [700.58.305]
  5. European Research Council (PHOTPROT) [267333]
  6. EU [GA 323901]
  7. Netherlands Royal Academy of Sciences (KNAW)
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [267333] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compare various theoretical approaches that are frequently used for modeling the excitation dynamics in photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes. As an example, we calculate the dynamics in the major light-harvesting complex from higher plants using the standard Redfield theory, the coherent modified Redfield theory combined with the generalized Forster theory, and the scaled hierarchical equation of motion (HEOM). The modified Redfield and coherent modified Redfield theories predict unrealistically fast transfers between weakly coupled and isoenergetic sites due to the secular character of these approaches. This shortcoming can be excluded by the artificial breaking of exciton mixing between these sites and invoking a generalized Forster theory to calculate the transfers between them. A critical cutoff indicating which exciton couplings should be broken is dependent on the energy gap between the corresponding sites (and therefore can be different for different parts of the complex). An adequate determination of the strongly coupled compartments of the whole complex allows us to obtain a quantitatively correct description with the combined Redfield-Forster approach, resulting in kinetics not much different from the exact HEOM solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据