4.0 Article

Metamorphic modeling and petrochronology of metapelitic rocks from the Luminarias Nappe, southern Brasilia belt (SE Brazil)

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA GEOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/2317-4889201920180114

关键词

West Gondwana; monazite dating; THERMOCALC; single element geothermometer; pseudosection

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2015/07750-0, 2015/05230-0, 2016/22627-3]
  2. National Council -CNPq [RAF-141604/2018-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Luminarias Nappe was formed in the agglutination of West Gondwana. A high-pressure metamorphic gradient oblique to the geological contacts is recorded in metapelitic rocks from this Nappe. In the northern portion, the metamorphic peak conditions are at high-pressure lower-amphibolite facies at 580 +/- 4 degrees C and ca. 0.9 GPa (Chl + Ky + St + Ms + Qtz + Rt); in the central portion, they are at high-pressure amphibolite facies at 600 +/- 15 degrees C and 1.1 +/- 0.3 GPa (St + Bt + Grt + Ms + Qtz + Rt); and in the southern portion, they reach the eclogite facies at 630 +/- 13 degrees C and 1.4 +/- 0.6 GPa (St + Ky + Grt + Ms + Qtz + Rt). Clockwise metamorphic P-T-t paths are registered in the studied rocks, with temperature and pressure increase followed by a strong decompression with retrograde phases as chloritoid (northern portion), chlorite and ilmenite (central portion) and biotite, chlorite and ilmenite (southern portion). U-Th-Pb-T monazite ages range from 632 +/- 4 Ma (southern portion) to 600 +/- 8 Ma (northern portion included crystals in garnet and staurolite). The metamorphic age, the high- pressure conditions calculated in this paper and the clockwise metamorphic path indicate that the tectonic evolution of the Luminarias Nappe rocks is tightly associated with the subduction and collision processes of the southern Brasilia belt. The overprint of the younger Ribeira belt is interpreted to be responsible for rock pile tilting, thus producing the oblique metamorphic gradient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据