4.6 Article

Spacer layer design for efficient fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cells

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 9, 期 51, 页码 29840-29846

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ra05357c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502141, 91733301, 91433203, 61474049, 51773230, 21702069]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [863, 2015AA034601]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019kfyXJJS051]
  4. Program for HUST Academic Frontier Youth Team
  5. Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province [2017AAA190]
  6. 111 Project [B07038]
  7. Double first-class research funding of China-EU Institute for Clean and Renewable Energy [ICARE-RP-2018-SOLAR-001, ICARE-RP-2018-SOLAR-002]
  8. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016053015544057]
  9. Nanshan Pilot Plan [LHTD20170001]
  10. NFSC/Hong Kong RGC Research Scheme [N_HKUST610/14]
  11. Guangdong Science and Technology Program [2017B030314002]
  12. HK-RGC General Research Funds (GRF) [16312216]
  13. HK Innovation and Technology Fund [ITS/219/16, GHP/079/17SZ]
  14. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612452, 2018M631240]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spacer layer is a key component of fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cells, but its precise characteristics are far from being understood in relation to the device design. In the present work, we perform a detailed systematic study on the effects of spacer parameters, such as size of building blocks, layer thickness, etc., on properties of the perovskite filler, insulating ability and performance of fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cells by combining the techniques of time-resolved photoluminescence, high-resolution TEM, insulating resistance measurements, impedance spectroscopy and J-V characteristics. Drawing on the deep understanding from these studies, we formulate key principles, which are anticipated to guide the design of the advanced spacer layer for fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据