4.8 Article

High-Throughput Computational Screening of Multivariate Metal-Organic Frameworks (MTV-MOFs) for CO2 Capture

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 8, 期 24, 页码 6135-6141

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02700

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences [DE-FG02-12ER16362]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51606081]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2016R1D1A1B03934484]
  4. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. Office of the Provost [p20663]
  6. Office for Research [p20663]
  7. Northwestern University Information Technology [p20663]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multivariate metal organic frameworks (MTV-MOFs) contain multiple linker types within a single structure. Arrangements of linkers containing different functional groups confer structural diversity and surface heterogeneity and result in a combinatorial explosion in the number of possible structures. In this work, we carried out high-throughput computational screening of a large number of computer-generated MTV-MOFs to assess their CO2 capture properties using grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations. The results demonstrate that functionalization enhances CO2 capture performance of MTV-MOFs when compared to their parent (unfunctionalized) counterparts, and the pore size plays a dominant role in determining the CO2 adsorption capabilities of MTV-MOFs irrespective of the combinations of the three functional groups (-F, -NH2, and -OCH3) that we investigated. We also found that the functionalization of parent MOFs with small pores led to larger enhancements in CO2 uptake and CO2/N-2 selectivity than functionalization in larger-pore MOFs. Free energy contour maps are presented to visually compare the influence of linker functionalization between frameworks with large and small pores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据