4.8 Article

Improving the Carrier Lifetime of Tin Sulfide via Prediction and Mitigation of Harmful Point Defects

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 8, 期 15, 页码 3661-3667

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01406

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. India Partnership to Advance Clean Energy Research for the Solar Energy Research Institute for India - U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, and Energy [E-AC36-08GO28308]
  2. U.S. India Partnership to Advance Clean Energy Research for the Solar Energy Research Institute for United States - U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, and [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  3. Government of India through the Department of Science and Technology [IUSSTF/JCERDC-SERIIUS/2012]
  4. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  5. U.S. Department of Energy through the SunShot Initiative [DE-EE0005329]
  6. TOTAL SA research grant through MITei
  7. Center for Excitonics, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001088]
  8. NSF [DMR-08-19762]
  9. Center for Nanoscale Systems at Harvard University under NSF Award [ECS-0335765]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tin monosulfide (SnS) is an emerging thin-film absorber material for photovoltaics. An outstanding challenge is to improve carrier lifetimes to >1 ns, which should enable >10% device efficiencies. However, reported results to date have only demonstrated lifetimes at or below 100 ps. In this study, we employ defect modeling to identify the sulfur vacancy and defects from Fe, Co, and Mo as most recombination active. We attempt to minimize these defects in crystalline samples through high-purity, sulfur-rich growth and experimentally improve lifetimes to >3 ns, thus achieving our 1 ns goal. This framework may prove effective for unlocking the lifetime potential in other emerging thin-film materials by rapidly identifying and mitigating lifetime-limiting point defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据