4.6 Article

Delayed Luminescence in Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 121, 期 24, 页码 13381-13390

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03771

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [MAT2014-55200, PCIN-2015-255, CTQ2014-60174-P]
  2. FEDER funds [TEC2014-53727-C2-1-R, MDM-2015-0538]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEOII/2014/059, PROMETEO/2012/053, PROMETEO/2016/135]
  4. MINECO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanism responsible for the extremely long photoluminescence (PL) lifetimes observed in many lead halide perovskites is still under debate. While the presence of trap states is widely accepted, the process of electron detrapping back to the emissive state has been mostly ignored, especially from deep traps as these are typically associated with nonradiative recombination. Here, we study the photophysics of methylammonium lead bromide perovskite nanocrystals (PNCs) with a photoluminescence quantum yield close to unity. We show that the lifetime of the spontaneous radiative recombination in PNCs is as short as 2 ns, which is expected considering the direct bandgap character of perovskites. All longer (up to microseconds) PL decay components result from the rapid reversible processes of multiple trapping and detrapping of carriers with a slow release of the excitation energy through the spontaneous emission channel. As our modeling shows, the trap (dark) and excitonic states are coupled by the trapping detrapping processes so that they follow the same population decay kinetics, while a majority of excited, carriers are in the dark state. The lifetime of the PNCs delayed luminescence is found to be determined by the depth of the trap states, lying from a few tens to hundreds meV below the emitting excitonic state. The delayed luminescence model proposed in this work can serve as a basis for the interpretation of other photoinduced transient phenomena observed in lead halide perovskites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据