4.6 Article

Luminescent Oil-Soluble Carbon Dots toward White Light Emission: A Spectroscopic Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 122, 期 1, 页码 839-849

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09788

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bilateral Project CNR-CNRST Italy-Morocco
  2. Apulia Region [MDI6SR]
  3. MIUR project PRIN [Prot. 2015XBZ5YA]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dots (C-dots) are emerging as new emitting nanomaterials for optoelectronics, bioimaging, and biosensing thanks to their high quantum yield (QY), biocompatibility, low toxicity, and cost-effective sources. Although the origin of their photoluminescence (PL) mechanism (i.e., their strong blue-green emission and excitation dependent fluorescence) is still controversial, it has been demonstrated to depend on the synthetic protocols and experimental conditions, able to Modify the surface properties. Here oil-dispersible C-dots, synthesized by carbonization of citric acid in the presence of hexadecylamine in high boiling organic solvent, are thoroughly investigated by systematically controlling the synthetic reaction parameters. Similarly to what was found for water-soluble C-dots, citric acid in the presence of amine-containing passivating agents improves the PL emission of-C-dots via the formation of molecular fluorescent derivatives alongside the carbonization process. We demonstrate that at, growth temperature of 200 degrees C such C-dots exhibit an interesting and intense white emission, when excited in the blue region, thus resulting, in a biocompatible colloidal white emitting single nano-objects. The incorporation of the nanoparticles in a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) host matrix, to obtain free-standing nanocomposite films, is demonstrated not to affect the color point, which still falls in the white color region of the 1931 CIE diagram. Remarkably, the emission properties are retained even after several months of films exposure to air and sunlight, thus confirming the color stability of the nanoparticles against aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据