4.6 Article

A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Model of Electrostatics in Multiply Charged Quantum Dots

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 121, 期 46, 页码 26086-26095

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08224

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [CHE-1464497, CHE-1506014, DMR-1719797]
  2. NSF Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure [OAC-1663636]
  3. STF at the University of Washington
  4. National Science Foundation [MRI-1624430]
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1624430] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Chemistry
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1464497] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a general model for describing the properties of excess electrons in multiply charged quantum dots (QDs). Key factors governing Fermi-level energies and electron density distributions are investigated by treating carrier densities, charge compensation, and various material and dielectric medium properties as independently tunable parameters. Electronic interactions are described using a mean-field electrostatic potential calculable through Gauss's Law by treating the quantum dot as a sphere of uniform charge density. This classical approximation modifies the Particle in a Sphere Schrodinger equation for a square well potential and reproduces the broken degeneracy and Fermi-level energies expected from experiment and first-principles methods. Several important implications emerge from this model: (i) excess electron density drifts substantially toward the QD surfaces with high electron densities and large radii and when solvated by a high dielectric medium. (ii) The maximum density of the conduction-band electrons depends strongly on the dielectric strength of the solvent and the electron affinity and dielectric strength of the QD material. (iii) Fermi-level energies stabilize with charge-balancing cations in close proximity to the QD surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据