4.7 Review

Elite power in low-carbon transitions: A critical and interdisciplinary review

期刊

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101242

关键词

Energy transitions; Energy justice; Climate justice; Political economy

资金

  1. European Union [730,403]
  2. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship [751843]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [751843] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modern energy systems have tended towards centralized control by states, and national and multinational energy companies. This implicates the power of elites in realizing low-carbon transitions. In particular, low-carbon transitions can create, perpetuate, challenge, or entrench the power of elites. Using a critical lens that draws from geography, political science, innovation studies, and social justice theory (among others), this article explores the ways in which transitions can exacerbate, reconfigure or be shaped by elite power. It does so by offering a navigational approach that surveys a broad collection of diverse literatures on power. It begins by conceptualizing power across a range of academic disciplines, envisioning power as involving both agents (corrective influence) and structures (pervasive influence). It then elaborates different types of power and the interrelationship between different sources of power, with a specific focus on elites, including conceptualizing elite power, resisting elite power, and power frameworks. The Review then examines scholarship relevant to elite power in low-carbon transitions-including the multi-level perspective, Michel Foucault, Antonio Gramsci, Anthony Giddens, Karl Marx, and other contextual approaches-before offering future research directions. The Review concludes that the power relations inherent in low-carbon transitions are asymmetrical but promisingly unstable. By better grappling with power analytically, descriptively, and even normatively, socially just and sustainable energy futures become not only more desirable but also more possible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据