4.6 Article

Parahydrogen Allows Ultrasensitive Indirect NMR Detection of Catalytic Hydrogen Complexes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 121, 期 18, 页码 9879-9888

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01056

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [14-13-01053]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [Bu 911/22-1]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [17-13-00033] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The H-1 NMR signal of dissolved molecular hydrogen enriched in parahydrogen (p-H-2) exhibits in the presence of an organometallic hydrogenation catalyst an unuSual,, partially negative line shape (PNL). It results from a strongly enhanced two-spin order connected to the population of the To level of orthohydrogen (o-H-2). This two-spin order is Made visible by a slow asymmetric exchange process between free hydrogen and a transient catalyst-hydrogen complex. By Only Parahydrogen Spectroscopy (OPSY) it is possible to selectively detect the two-spin order and suppress the signal from the thermal o-H-2. The intensity of the PNL can be strongly affected by the PArtially NEgative Line (PANEL) experiment, which irradiates a long narrow-band radio frequency (RF) pulse. When the RF:is in resonance with the chemical shift values of the hydrogen bound to the elusive catalyst or of the free hydrogen, a strong intensity reduction of the PNL is observed. Numerical simulations of the experiments performed at 500 and 700 MHz proton frequency show that the indirect detection has 2t least 3 orders of magnitude higher sensitivity than the normal NMR experiment. A theoretical model, including reversible binding and S-T-o evolution, is developed) which reproduces the NMR line shape, the nutation angle dependence and the dependence on the frequency of the irradiation field of the PNL and permits the determination of the proton chemical shift values and the sign of the scalar coupling in the transient NMR invisible complex where singlet-triplet conversion take place.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据