4.5 Article

Passage-Based Text Summarization for Legal Information Retrieval

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 44, 期 11, 页码 9159-9169

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-019-03998-1

关键词

Legal information retrieval; Information retrieval; Text summarization; Legal domain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Automatic text summarization is a process of condensing the content of a text document to pursue the most important information. It plays a significant role in various tasks like text categorization, question answering and information retrieval (IR). As legal information retrieval (LIR) is a subfield of IR, the produced summaries are combined into IR system, with the objective of decreasing the length of the document. In this way, we can improve the access time for searching the information, and relevant documents are retrieved. In this article, we present the creation of passage-level summaries (generic and legal) with different compression ratios and evaluate their performance. The generic summaries present the overall description of the essential information of a document and legal summaries, produced by taking into account the domain-specific features that are present in the document. Next, we propose Boosting Okapi BM25 which is the modified model of Okapi BM25 to increase the efficiency of the LIR. We have evaluated proposed LIR approach in terms of MAP and R-precision and summarization approach using ROUGE tool on FIRE2013 and FIRE2014 datasets. To show the efficacy of the proposed system, we compare the experimental results with different IR models like PL2, In_expB2, In_expC2, InL2, DFR_BM25, OkapiBM25 in terms of MAP. The experimental results of the proposed system show better performance than the existing various IR models in terms of various performance metrics. The empirical results also exhibit that the integration of text summarization and IR techniques helps in retrieving relevant information with less access time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据