期刊
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 103-122出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1027004
关键词
Outcomes assessment; psychometrics; questionnaire; reliability; responsiveness; rotator cuff; self-report; shoulder; validity
资金
- Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauve en Sante et Securite au Travail (IRSST)
- Reseau Provincial de Recherche en Adaptation-Readaptation/Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante (REPAR/FRQ-S)
- FRQ-S
Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of the psychometric properties (reliability, validity and responsiveness) of self-report questionnaires used to assess symptoms and functional limitations of individuals with rotator cuff (RC) disorders. Methods: A systematic search in three databases (Cinahl, Medline and Embase) was conducted. Data extraction and critical methodological appraisal were performed independently by three raters using structured tools, and agreement was achieved by consensus. A descriptive synthesis was performed. Results: One-hundred and twenty articles reporting on 11 questionnaires were included. All questionnaires were highly reliable and responsive to change, and showed construct validity; seven questionnaires also shown known-group validity. The minimal detectable change ranged from 6.4% to 20.8% of total score; only two questionnaires (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon questionnaire [ASES] and Upper Limb Functional Index [ULFI]) had a measurement error below 10% of global score. Minimal clinically important differences were established for eight questionnaires, and ranged from 8% to 20% of total score. Conclusion: Overall, included questionnaires showed acceptable psychometric properties for individuals with RC disorders. The ASES and ULFI have the smallest absolute error of measurement, while the Western Ontario RC Index is one of the most responsive questionnaires for individuals suffering from RC disorders.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据