3.8 Article

Assessment of a Combination of Clinical Maneuvers in Evaluation of Post-Laparoscopic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13224-019-01224-4

关键词

Post laparoscopic shoulder pain; Upper abdomen pain; Pulmonary recruitment maneuver; Intraperitoneal normal saline infusion; Incision site pain; Local anaesthetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background To assess the efficacy of the combined maneuvers in evaluation of post-laparoscopic pain. Material and Methods A randomized controlled study was conducted. Sixty-four women were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups. Intervention group received combined maneuvers such as intraperitoneal normal saline infusion, pulmonary recruitment maneuver and local bupivacaine instillation at port sites after laparoscopic surgery. Control group received routine care. Main Outcome Measures Upper abdominal pain, shoulder pain and incision site pain were noted in both groups at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively. Results The median interquartile range (in centiles) of upper abdominal pain score 3, 6 and 12 h postoperatively in the intervention group was 1.0 (0.25-1.0), 1.0 (0.0-1.0) and 0.50 (0.0-1.0), and in the control group, the values were 2.0 (2.0-1.0), 2.0 (2.0-1.0) and 1.0 (0-1.0) at 3, 6 and 12 h, respectively (p < 0.000). The median interquartile range of shoulder pain score 3, 6 and 12 h postoperatively in the intervention group was 0.0 (0.0-1.0), 0.0 (0.0-0.75) and 0.0 (0.0-1.0), and in the control group, the values were 1.0 (0.0-2.0), 1.0 (0.0-1.75) and 1.0 (0-1.0) at 3, 6, and 12 h. The upper abdominal pain and shoulder pain relief was significantly more in the intervention group than in the control group in the first 12 h of surgery. Conclusion Combined maneuvers could significantly reduce post-laparoscopic upper abdominal and shoulder pain. Clinical Trial CTRI Registration Number-CTRI/2017/07/0089, web address of CTRI-http://ctri.nic.in

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据