4.4 Article

Preparation, pharmacokinetics and tumour-suppressive activity of berberine liposomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 69, 期 6, 页码 625-632

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12692

关键词

antitumour; berberine; long-circulating liposomes; pharmacokinetics

资金

  1. Jiangsu Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration Project [FY201503]
  2. Jiangsu Province Social Development Project [BE2009696]
  3. College Natural Science Research Project in Jiangsu Province [15KJB350004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesBerberine (BBR) has shown promising antitumour effects invitro. However, intravenous administration of BBR solution is complicated by lethal adverse cardiovascular effects. The aim of this study was to prepare common and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-modified long-circulating BBR liposomes and evaluate their efficacy and safety as potential antitumour agents. MethodsPhysiochemical properties of common and long-circulating BBR liposomes were characterized including particle size, Zeta potential and thermal stability. Pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution study of liposomal BBR was performed in rats and tumour-bearing nude mice, respectively. Antitumour efficacy and safety were observed in SGC-7901 tumour-xenografted mice. Key findingsBerberine liposomes showed homogenous morphology, storage stability and sustained-releasing behaviour invitro. BBR liposomes led to significantly increased circulation retention of BBR in comparison with BBR solution. In tumour-bearing mice, BBR liposomes selectively increased BBR concentrations in the liver, spleen, lung and tumour, while conferred lower distribution to the heart and kidney. Importantly, chronic administration of BBR liposomes proved effective and safe in suppressing the tumour growth in nude mice, especially the PEG-modified long-circulating liposomes. ConclusionOur study suggested that BBR liposomes may provide a safe form of intravenous drug therapy for strengthening the antitumour effects of BBR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据