4.5 Article

Connexin 43 enhances Bax activation via JNK activation in sunitinib-induced apoptosis in mesothelioma cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 134, 期 2, 页码 101-107

出版社

JAPANESE PHARMACOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphs.2017.05.005

关键词

Connexin; Bax; Mitochondria; Apoptosis; JNK

资金

  1. Leading Graduate School at Chiba University
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences (JSPS) [201604170]
  3. JSPS [15K19161]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K19161, 16J04170] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The constituent protein of gap junctions, connexin (Cx), interacts with various proteins via its C-terminus region, including kinases, cell-adhesion proteins, and a pro-apoptotic protein, Bax. This molecular interaction may affect expression and functioning of the interacting proteins and modulate the cellular physiology. In our previous work, Cx43 was found to interact directly with Bax and in the presence of sunitinib, lead to the Bax-mediated apoptosis in mesothelioma cells. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of how Cx43 promotes Bax-mediated apoptosis using the same cell line. Treatment with sunitinib increased the expression of the active conformation of the Bax protein, which was predominantly localized at the mitochondria, only in Cx43-transfected cells. Bax oligomerization and decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential were also observed. The involvement of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in the interaction of Cx43 and Bax was further examined. Treatment with sunitinib increased the expression of phosphorylated (active) form of JNK only in the Cx43-transfected cells. Phosphorylated JNK and active Bax were co-localized, and the co-localization was suppressed by the knockdown of Cx43. Moreover, JNK inhibition clearly suppressed Bax activation. In conclusion, we identified a novel Cx43-JNK-Bax axis regulating the process of apoptosis for the first time. (C) 2017 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据