4.5 Article

Analysis of Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics of a Highly Albumin-Bound Compound: Contribution of Albumin-Mediated Hepatic Uptake Mechanism

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
卷 106, 期 9, 页码 2704-2714

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.04.052

关键词

albumin; mathematical model; pharmacokinetics; protein binding; organic anion-transporting polypeptide transporters; food effects; hepatic transport; nonlinear pharmacokinetics; clinical pharmacokinetics; ADME

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cause of nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PK) (more than dose-proportional increase in exposure) of a urea derivative under development (compound A: anionic compound [pKa: 4.4]; LogP: 6.5; and plasma protein binding: 99.95%) observed in a clinical trial was investigated. Compound A was metabolized by CYP3A4, UGT1A1, and UGT1A3 with unbound K-m of 3.3-17.8 mu mol/L. OATP1B3-mediated uptake of compound A determined in the presence of human serum albumin (HSA) showed that unbound K-m and V-max decreased with increased HSA concentration. A greater decrease in unbound K-m than in V-max resulted in increased uptake clearance (V-max/unbound K-m) with increased HSA concentration, the socalled albumin-mediated uptake. At 2% HSA concentration, unbound K-m was 0.00657 mu mol/L. A physiologically based PK model assuming saturable hepatic uptake nearly replicated clinical PK of compound A. Unbound K-m for hepatic uptake estimated from the model was 0.000767 mu mol/L, lower than the in vitro unbound K-m at 2% HSA concentration, whereas decreased K-m with increased concentration of HSA in vitro indicated lower K-m at physiological HSA concentration (4%-5%). In addition, unbound K-m values for metabolizing enzymes were much higher than unbound K-m for OATP1B3, indicating that the nonlinear PK of compound A is primarily attributed to saturated OATP1B3-mediated hepatic uptake of compound A. (C) 2017 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据