4.5 Article

Experimental study on the variation of relative permeability due to clay minerals in low salinity water-flooding

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 292-304

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.014

关键词

Low salinity water-flooding; Clay minerals; Relative permeability; Wettability alteration

资金

  1. Energy Efficiency & Resources of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy [20152510101980]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents experimental results on the variation of relative permeability due to clay types and contents in low salinity water-flooding. To analyze the effect of clay types and contents on relative permeability, core flooding using unconsolidated sand core samples was conducted. Relative permeability curves were measured from the experiments using the Johnson, Bossier, and Naumann (JBN) method. From the results, the moving range (S-or-S-wi) of the relative permeability curve was proportional to the clay contents of kaolinite. The moving range for illite also showed a relative permeability curve proportional to the clay contents, but it was less than that for kaolinite. To extend the equation of the Honarpour end-point relative permeability curves in low salinity water-flooding, end-point relative permeability curves were matched With the experimental relative permeability curves by charging the Honarpour index N-o and N-w. Then, the difference of N-o and N-w between the conventional water-flooding and the low salinity water-flooding was correlated with the clay contents. Based on the results, extended functions of index N-o and N-w were proposed to describe the relative permeability curves applied to low salinity water-flooding. It is believed that end-point relative permeability curves can be determined by the proposed N-o and N-w instead of the conventional exponent index in low salinity water flooding with reservoirs containing kaolinite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据