4.5 Article

An efficient adaptive algorithm for robust control optimization using StoSAG

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 314-330

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.09.002

关键词

Robust reservoir optimization; Adaptive sub-set optimization; Well control optimization; Stochastic gradient; Ensemble based optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is significant geological uncertainty in the reservoir description due to the limited knowledge about the underground formation. The common approach is to use multiple plausible geostatistical realizations of the reservoir model in order to quantify the uncertainty, however, usually a small ensemble of realizations is utilized in the robust optimization due to the computational cost. This may results in erroneous estimation of uncertainty in the predicted optimal reservoir production performance. We propose an efficient algorithm for robust optimization where a large number of representative realizations are considered. The algorithm proposed in this work assumes confidence in a subset of realizations for representing the full-set of realizations in the neighbourhood of the current control estimate. The subset is chosen based on a ranking method and modified adaptively throughout the optimization iterations. The optimizer in this paper is the steepest ascent method using the Stochastic Simplex Approximate Gradient (StoSAG), but the proposed algorithm is suitable to be combined with other optimization algorithms. Three synthetic reservoir examples generated with different geostatistical modelling methods are tested to validate the proposed algorithm. All three examples show that compared with a full-set robust optimization, the proposed adaptive robust optimization algorithm not only improves the optimization convergence rate, but also find a higher optimal NPV when the optimization is terminated at a maximum affordable simulation cost using the stochastic simplex gradient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据