4.5 Article

Standardized Rat Model Testing Effects of Inflammation and Grafting on Extraction Healing

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 88, 期 8, 页码 799-807

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2017.160771

关键词

Bone remodeling; inflammation; rats; tooth extraction

资金

  1. Mary and Dick Holland Regenerative Medicine Program (Omaha, Nebraska) [2004-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Loss of alveolar ridge width and height after tooth extraction is well documented, but models to evaluate ridge preservation are neither standardized nor cost-effective. This rat model characterizes the pattern of bone turnover and inflammation after extraction and bone grafting with or without local simvastatin (SIM). Methods: Fifty retired-breeder rats underwent extraction of the maxillary right first molar and standard surgical defect creation under inhalation/local anesthesia. The left side of each animal served as unmanipulated control. Untreated groups (n = 8 to 9 per group) were compared (analysis of variance, t test) at days 0, 7, 14, and 28 for alveolar ridge height and width and for markers of inflammation and bone turnover by microcomputed tomography, histology, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Seventeen additional specimens had defects grafted with either bone mineralized matrix (BMM) or a BMM+ SIM conjugate. Results: Extraction-induced bone loss (BL) was noted on buccal, palatal, and interproximal height (P < 0.05) and ridge width (P < 0.01). Week 1 inflammation positively correlated with ridge height; thereafter, a more intense inflammatory reaction corresponded to reduction in alveolar bone height and density (r = 0.74; P < 0.05; Spearman). BMM+ SIM preserved the most interproximal bone height (P < 0.01), increased ridge width and bone density (P < 0.01), enhanced 7-day prostaglandin E2 (P < 0.01), and reduced 28-day inflammation density (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The standard defect used in the current study paralleled human postextraction alveolar BL. Defect grafting, especially BMM+ SIM, reduced inflammation and preserved bone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据