4.3 Article

Soil Freezing and Soil Water Retention Characteristics: Connection and Solute Effects

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000851

关键词

Soil-water characteristic curve; Soil freezing characteristic curve; Matric potential; Osmotic potential; Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [11502276, 41572293]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi [2012GXNSFGA060001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relation between the soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) and the soil freezing characteristic curve (SFCC) is investigated based on the similarity between the freezing/thawing and drying/wetting behaviors of soils. The SWCCs of clay and silt are obtained by the pressure plate extractor and vapor pressure method, while the SFCCs are determined from the unfrozen water content measurement using the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and temperature measurement. The pore water potential of the frozen soil is derived from a generalized Clapeyron equation, which addresses the effects of capillarity, sorption, and osmosis, and compared to that of unsaturated soils. Our experimental results show that at low water content the matric potential in the soil saturated with pore water and pore ice is generally different from that in the soil saturated with pore water and pore gas. A series of experiments on the soil samples saturated by NaCl solutions of different concentrations were performed to determine the osmotic potential and the water retention characteristics. Based on the principles of surface chemistry, a relationship between the adsorptive forces and the water film thickness is developed, which is capable of describing the soil water characteristic when the sorption effect is significant. Our results indicate that the freezing-point depression method should be applied with caution in determining the soil water retention characteristics of unsaturated soils at lower water content. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据