4.6 Article

MITOL deletion in the brain impairs mitochondrial structure and ER tethering leading to oxidative stress

期刊

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE LLC
DOI: 10.26508/lsa.201900308

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI
  2. MEXT
  3. JSPS KAKENHI
  4. Comprehensive Brain Science Network (CBSN)
  5. National Institute for Physiological Sciences
  6. National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry [30-5]
  7. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  8. Naito Foundation
  9. Sumitomo Science Foundation
  10. Cosmetology Research Foundation
  11. Ono Medical Research Foundation
  12. Tokyo Biochemical Research Foundation
  13. AMED [JP17gm5010002, JP18gm5010002]
  14. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K16527] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial abnormalities are associated with developmental disorders, although a causal relationship remains largely unknown. Here, we report that increased oxidative stress in neurons by deletion of mitochondrial ubiquitin ligase MITOL causes a potential neuroinflammation including aberrant astrogliosis and microglial activation, indicating that mitochondrial abnormalities might confer a risk for inflammatory diseases in brain such as psychiatric disorders. A role of MITOL in both mitochondrial dynamics and ER-mitochondria tethering prompted us to characterize three-dimensional structures of mitochondria in vivo. In MITOL-deficient neurons, we observed a significant reduction in the ER-mitochondria contact sites, which might lead to perturbation of phospholipids transfer, consequently reduce cardiolipin biogenesis. We also found that branched large mitochondria disappeared by deletion of MITOL. These morphological abnormalities of mitochondria resulted in enhanced oxidative stress in brain, which led to astrogliosis and microglial activation partly causing abnormal behavior. In conclusion, the reduced ER-mitochondria tethering and excessive mitochondrial fission may trigger neuroinflammation through oxidative stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据