4.6 Article

Neonatal Surgery for Noncardiac Congenital Anomalies: Neonates at Risk of Brain Injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 335-341

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.080

关键词

-

资金

  1. NUTS OHRA Foundation [1201-063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To evaluate the incidence of brain injury after neonatal surgery for noncardiac congenital anomalies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study design An MRI was obtained in 101 infants at 7 days [range: 1-115] after neonatal surgery for major noncardiac congenital anomalies. Brain injury was assessed using T1, T2, diffusion weighted imaging, and susceptibility-weighted imaging. Results Thirty-two preterm infants (< 37 weeks of gestation) and 69 full-term infants were included. MRI abnormalities were found in 24 (75%) preterm and 40 (58%) full-term infants. Parenchymal lesions were noted in 23 preterm (72%) and 29 full-term infants (42%). These consisted of punctate white matter lesions (n = 45), punctate cerebellar lesions (n = 17), thalamic infarction (n = 5), and periventricular hemorrhagic infarction (n = 4). Nonparenchymal abnormalities were found in 9 (28%) preterm and 26 (38%) full-term infants. These included supra-and infratentorial subdural hemorrhages (n = 30), intraventricular hemorrhage grade II (n = 7), and asymptomatic sinovenous thrombosis (n = 1). A combination of parenchymal lesions was present in 21 infants. Of infants who had an MRI within 10 days after surgery, punctate white matter lesions were visible on diffusion weighted imaging in 22 (61%), suggestive of recent ischemic origin. Type of congenital anomaly and prematurity were most predictive of brain injury. Conclusions Infants who have neonatal surgery for noncardiac congenital anomalies are at risk of brain injury, potentially accounting for the neurodevelopmental delay frequently observed in this population. Further research is warranted into potential mechanisms of brain injury and its timing of onset. Long-term neurodevelopmental followup is needed in this vulnerable population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据