4.6 Article

Ab initio exact diagonalization simulation of the Nagaoka transition in quantum dots

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 100, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.155133

关键词

-

资金

  1. Harvard-MIT Center for Ultracold Atoms, NSF [DMR-1308435]
  2. AFOSR-MURI Photonic Quantum Matter [FA95501610323]
  3. DARPA DRINQS program [D18AC00014]
  4. Postdoctoral Fellowship in Quantum Science of the Harvard-MPQ Center for Quantum Optics
  5. NSF
  6. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  7. Villum Foundation
  8. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  9. Villum Fonden [00007365] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent progress of quantum simulators provides insight into the fundamental problems of strongly correlated systems. To adequately assess the accuracy of these simulators, the precise modeling of the many-body physics, with accurate model parameters, is crucially important. In this paper, we employed an ab initio exact diagonalization framework to compute the correlated physics of a few electrons in artificial potentials. We apply this approach to a quantum-dot system and study the magnetism of the correlated electrons, obtaining good agreement with recent experimental measurements in a plaquette. Through control of dot potentials and separation, including geometric manipulation of tunneling, we examine the Nagaoka transition and determine the robustness of the ferromagnetic state. While the Nagaoka theorem considers only a single-band Hubbard model, in this work we perform extensive ab initio calculations that include realistic multiorbital conditions in which the level splitting is smaller than the interactions. This simulation complements the experiments and provides insight into the formation of ferromagnetism in correlated systems. More generally, our calculation sets the stage for further theoretical analysis of analog quantum simulators at a quantitative level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据