4.6 Article

Clinical Risk Factors for Punctate White Matter Lesions on Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preterm Newborns

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 34-40

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.073

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 79262, MOP 86489]
  2. Kids Brain Health Network National Centres of Excellence
  3. Child and Family Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To identify clinical risk factors for punctate white matter lesions (PWML) on early magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 2 cohorts of newborns born extremely preterm in different neonatal centers. Study design A total of 250 newborns born preterm at less than 28 weeks of gestation (mean 26.4 +/- 1.1 weeks) with an early MRI were identified from 2 neonatal centers, in Vancouver, Canada (cohort A, n = 100) and Utrecht, the Netherlands (cohort B, n = 150). Cohort A was imaged as part of a prospective research study and cohort B was imaged as part of routine clinical care. PWML were defined as cluster type foci of hyperintensity on T1-weighted imaging and were identified at a mean postmenstrual age of 31.1 (+/- 1.9) weeks. Multivariable analysis was used to identify clinical factors predictive of PWML. Results Cluster type PWML were found in 47 newborns born extremely preterm (18.8%) and were more common in cohort A (32%) than in cohort B (10%). Newborns in cohort A generally were sicker than those in cohort B. Multivariable analyses revealed that greater birth weight (B = 0.002; P <.02), grade II-III intraventricular hemorrhage (B = 0.83; P <.02), and cohort A (B = 1.34; P <.0001) were independent predictors of PWML. Conclusion Several risk factors for PWML on early MRI were identified. The interaction among birth weight, intraventricular hemorrhage, and other aspects of postnatal illness as risk factors for PWML warrants further investigation in newborns born extremely preterm and may help to identify modifiable risk factors for PWML.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据