4.6 Article

A KCl-assisted pyrolysis strategy to fabricate nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube hollow polyhedra for efficient bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 35, 页码 20310-20316

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta07481c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21825802, 21576095, 21436005]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019PY11]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201804020009]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering [2017ZD04, 2018TS03]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A050502004, 2017A030312005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fabrication of stable and low-cost bifunctional electrocatalysts with high activities for both oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is of vital importance and challenge for regenerative fuel cells and metal-air batteries. Here, we firstly report a simple KCl-assisted pyrolysis strategy to construct hybrid architectures with Co nanoparticles embedded in N-doped carbon nanotube hollow polyhedra (NCNHP) by using ZIF-67 as the precursor. The presence of KCl accelerates the decomposition of ZIF-67 and promotes the in situ formation of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) during the pyrolysis at temperatures as low as 400 degrees C. The optimal NCNHP-1-500 with a CNT-assembled hierarchical architecture and abundant Co-N-x active sites exhibits excellent OER activity when benchmarked with commercial IrO2, achieving a needed overpotential of only 310 mV to reach the current density of 10 mA cm(-2). NCNHP-1-500 also displays satisfactory ORR activity with a half-wave potential of 0.828 V vs. RHE that is comparable to that of commercial Pt/C (20 wt% Pt), and superior methanol tolerance and stability to Pt/C. The KCl-assisted pyrolysis strategy might bring new opportunities to fabricate novel hybrid architectures for highly efficient bifunctional OER and ORR electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据